0 comments Friday, May 30, 2008

I was listening to a panel discussion with Dever, Ligon Duncan, John MacArthur, Mahaney and Mohler, when I heard an amazing quote by Dever that started at about the 1:16 point. It goes: "I'm encouraged in my evangelism because I know that when I'm preaching to corpses I don't have to figure out how to make them believe." I would reference this to Ephesians 2:1.

--

Ligon Duncan is probably the man I know the least about who will fall under the category of "Characters". The only way I know him is 1) through the ministry of the Council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, and 2) through the ministry of the Together For the Gospel friendship (which runs the conference that had the panel discussion that I listed above). He's a paedobaptist, so I probably won't reference him too much. This is not to say that I think that misunderstandings of baptism are Gospel issues, but I do think that it makes evangelism more difficult, it makes the Roman Catholic Controversy more difficult to talk about than it needs to be, and it makes talking about ecclesiology, the study of all things related to the local church, more difficult. So, while I'm sure that I would respect him, as I do John Calvin or Tim Keller, I would simply prefer to refer you to a credobaptist than a paedobaptist.

I think that John MacArthur is the best contemporary Bible preacher - yes, better than Dever. He is so good at getting his congregation into the context that you feel confident that you know what the text means. Praise God that Mac (what I'll colloquially call Dr. MacArthur, typically) was blessed with such gifts of bringing clarity! Now, for full disclosure, MacArthur subscribes to, what I would call, some peculiar doctrines that I think are unnecessary and very weakly supported, and some that have larger significance, that he is very firm on, but that I still think that he's wrong on. I respect him, and thank God for him primarily for his ability to exposit the Scriptures.

1 comments Wednesday, May 28, 2008

I keep thinking about the issue of Gay Marriage. Clearly, homosexuality is sin, as presented in the Bible. I constantly wonder what morality should be turned into national law. The following are preliminary thoughts and no Bible references. My next post will venture a little into what insight the Bible gives us.
 
For example, I do think that marriage is a very important institution, that any country must recognize. That makes me think that in order to protect the posterity, marriage should be restricted to exactly what the Bible prescribed. So, let's say that gets legislated into law. Next, we recognize that adultery is pretty bad, so it gets legislated into law. So far, I'm not too bothered by it. I wonder whether it's okay, but if it were to happen, I don't think that I would argue it. Then, we say that any sex outside of a legitimate marriage is illicit. Then, make masturbation illegal. Then, make absenteeism from a legitimate church on Sunday a crime. At what point is the government oppressive?
 
I feel very uncomfortable at the notion of forcing people to go to church. I think that most Christians would feel uncomfortable with this. Beyond this, I recognize of my heart that I think that I feel much more at ease legislating law against sins that I do not think that I will succumb to than I do at legislating law over sins that I am tempted to do. I have no immediate problem with the idea of making even the slightest drug infraction - including nicotine - illegal. However, the idea of legislating law against gluttony scares me.
 
This makes me think that I should try to put my feet in the shoes of the adulteress or the homosexual.
 
However, it takes a worldview to create law. Christians have a perfectly good worldview. Why not use it? On top of that, certain things I think are absolutely essential to protect - the dignity of human life (murder, racism, abortion, euthanasia, suicide). I also think that violence should be illegal. I think that slavery should be illegal.
 
Ultimately, what I'm trying to say is that on the one extreme, there are certain things that are sin, that I don't want the government to enforce, but, there are also things that are sin, that I absolutely do want to be enforced by the government. The question is, then, where should the line be drawn?

0 comments Tuesday, May 27, 2008

In various posts I may use the (distinct) terms "church" and "Church". When I refer to the latter, I am talking about all believers in the entire world. It can also be called the Church Universal, the Invisible Church or, if properly understood, the Catholic Church (note, not the Roman Catholic Church). But when I use the word "church", I am referring to a local body of baptized believers, gathering in covenant (i.e., membership - for details, consider reading some of Mark Dever's writing on the Sixth Mark of a Healthy Church or Piper), with a structure of authority under Christ, forming an image of the Invisible Church as a witness to the surrounding society.
 
If you want more details on what I think the church is supposed to look like I would highly recommend all of Dr. Dever's materials or even his book Nine Marks of a Healthy Church.
 
Since this is a "Character" post, I would also like to give a quick word about Dr. Dever. I discovered Dr. Dever originally at desiringGod.org from one of the conferences, but came to grow quite fond of his ministry when I heard an interview that C.J. Mahaney did with Dr. Dever. I agreed completely with his theological views, admired him for his respect for Piper, and had a huge respect for his brillance. It was then that I started reading his articles about local churches and truly adored his desire for precision in defending doctrines. He's probably the pastor that I feel like I can relate to best among contemporary, (relatively) well-known, evangelical preachers. He is also a tremendous preacher. In fact, one thing that keeps me liking him is that he actually preaches the Old Testament. He does a great job with it. In fact, Derek Thomas said, "Mark Dever, of Capital Hill Baptist Church, Washington, D.C., for example, more than anyone else I know, has the ability to preach through large portions of Scripture in one sermon," in the article Preaching from Lengthy Books in the Old Testament.
 
(As a review, I've mentioned three characters in this post: Dever, Mahaney, and Thomas.)

0 comments Monday, May 26, 2008

On Saturday, I was taking the elevator up to my mother's condominium with another guy in the elevator. I was carrying a notebook, the type that we used in elementary school that's big and colourful on the outside, and he asked me whether I was going to study. I told him that school was over. So he asked what the book what for, so I told him for notes, not realizing that my response would probably perplex him. Upon his confusion, he asked me whether it was recreational, so I made it more clear, "Sermon notes. Church notes." He finally understood it. He then asked what church, wondering whether I was with the Latter Day Saints (or LDS, for short). I quickly said, "No" and told him that I was a baptist, as he walked out of the elevator. Either he's a Mormon, in which case his response wouldn't scare me at all, or else, we as evangelicals have done a poor job of representing ourselves in society.

0 comments Saturday, May 24, 2008

I started a while back a blog entry on how far Christians can engage in the political process with their Christian morality. Specifically, I know that an issue that's been brought up before at OCBC's YA has been whether the government should have the right to define marriage. (Forgive my lack of detail and precision as I try to express the issue crudely.)

Though it was originally supposed to be a simple entry, taking up no more than one page in Microsoft Word, it has now become a project. I'm really enjoying working on it. I'm trying to evenly represent each side of the argument, assuming each side is Christian. As soon as it's done I'll post it. I might post it over a series of entries, though, since it's going to be extremely long. If you want to help out, you can state your stance, and explain why you think (i.e., not feel) that your stance is correct.

Anyway, perhaps I'll leave a personal note as well, while I'm writing.

I just got back from Abbotsford, BC where my orientation training was since I've joined Power to Change staff. It was pretty nice. Though it was only sunny for two days, while most of the time it was overcast. The city was remarkably small. But there were a ton of churches there. Sunday was our day off. In the morning I went to a church called Vintage 242 (i.e., Ac. 2:42), which is an Acts 29 church plant (the church planting organization that Mark Driscoll was at least a part of establishing). It was small and the congregation met in a movie theatre. The pastor was passionate about evangelism and doctrine. It felt like OCBC. Then, in the evening, three friends and I went to Seattle for the 5PM (PST) service at Mars Hill Church, Ballard Campus. The music wasn't my style, and Driscoll wasn't as entertaining as he used to be, but I'd love to go back. The building that it took place in was amazing - very masculine. I stink at describing my aesthetic observations but the place was great. Big spaces, well organized, masculine colours, not overly elaborate. It was a great experience. I want to learn what they did there so that I can do it if I plant a church.
 
But I'm back now. I should be able to post a couple of times each month, and maybe even finish the project before the end of June. We'll see.

2 comments Tuesday, May 13, 2008

This past Sunday was the Global Day of Prayer. In previous years all the Greater Toronto Area gathered in one central location (e.g., the Air Canada Centre). This year, they made it more local. My church (in Mississauga) was assigned to go to a church in nearby Oakville.
 
When I got to the church and sat down in the pew I almost immediately noticed that there were (relatively) new pew Bibles. Knowing that Piper's church (Bethlehem Baptist Church) had recently changed the pew Bibles from the NASB (i.e., the New American Standard Bible) to the ESV (i.e., the English Standard Version) I was thinking that this might be the first church I'd been to that made the switch to the ESV.
 
Nope. The pew Bible was a TNIV (i.e., Today's New International Version). The TNIV is known for being a gender-neutral Bible. The next thing I knew, one of the coordinators of the GDOP (i.e., the Global Day of Prayer) stood at the front and introduced herself as Pastor Joan.
 
Then, we were singing We Want to See Jesus Lifted High. The first verse originally went:
We want to see Jesus lifted high
a banner that flies across this land
That all men might see the truth and know
He is the way to heaven
but at that church the third line went "That all people might see the truth and know".
 
This change wouldn't on its own be bad. It doesn't change the meaning of the song. But it makes me wonder why that church was being so vigilant to make such minor changes. They didn't even write the song so they don't have the right to change the wording.
 
The whole event was a little weird (e.g., flag waving), but I merely wanted to comment on the length to which some egalitarians are going.

0 comments Friday, May 9, 2008

On Wednesday my last course posted the final grade. I knew that I was done. I'm not a student at Carleton anymore. I opened up a record of the status of my degree at Carleton (the degree audit report, for my Carleton buddies) and it said, "ALL REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BELOW HAVE BEEN MET". It was a very sweet moment.

It's tough to believe. After 19 years of schooling (from Junior Kindergarten to fifth year of University) I'm out. Realistically, I'm not done with academia. I'm excited about going to seminary some day and dipping my toes in the riches of theology that great men have dug up before me. But, that's year from now. Real life is before me. I feel liberated.

Accomplishment is a great feeling.

0 comments Sunday, May 4, 2008

I'm worried that having made the previous post and adding the list of Piper links that I've taken away from the seriousness of my blog. I really don't want this blog to be a joke. So, to balance the previous post with my desire for this blog to be civil, sensitive, from my heart, and God centred, I would like to elaborate on why I promote the ministry of John Piper so much in my Christian circles.

Firstly, I am immensely indebted to him for his teaching ministry. Dr. Piper has shown me that there is Truth in the Bible and that some of it needs to be dug out. His passion for going after the unseen and making it plain to lay people such as myself has inspired me. I read the Bible more now because I've seen what God has shown Dr. Piper and I want to see it myself.

Next, I had never so clearly heard anyone say that Jesus is worth dying for. It was radical. I saw it in the Bible, but it wasn't something that Christians were outright saying. It seemed inconsistent until I heard Dr. Piper give the challenge to not waste my life.

Thirdly, Dr. Piper's theology of Christian Hedonism makes me believe that God is indeed personal. If the definition of love is obedience (as some say 1J. 5:2 teaches) then that god would merely be a machine awaiting accurate input. Instead, this God wants to be loved. He wants me to delight myself in Him and that the love of good and joy in doing good would compel me to act.

There's so much more to say, but I'll conclude with this. In all my imaginings about God before I became a Christian, I didn't understand why He created us. Dr. Piper's view of the sovereign God of the Bible who ordains all history for His glory makes sense of my questions. If God were anything less than sovereign, or if He were anything less than focussed on His own glory, He wouldn't be omnipotent, He wouldn't be omniscient. He simply wouldn't be the ultimate, Creator God.

I do evangelism because when I heard the Glorious News of Jesus Christ it brought me to my knees as I cried over my sin and thanked God simultaneously for my forgiveness, and it is my desire to bring that to others. I want to share John Piper's ministry with others because he has brought me so much closer to God that I want everyone to have that opportunity as well.

0 comments

I decided to make my blog a little bit more God centred by making it more Piper saturated, although, right now it's not even close to appearing saturated. To begin pushing it in that direction I've decided to create an ongoing list of the Piper stuff that I've been reading that I recommend.

2 comments Friday, May 2, 2008

Last year when I got back from Tanzania I wrote a list of the characteristics that I think every Christian man should exemplify. I was motivated to do this having worked with some tremendous men who displayed amazing character and vision and love for Jesus Christ. Furthermore, a girl I was working with commented that she respected the biblical man I described. I figured I would share these characteristics.

Another thing to note is that these come from the mind of a single guy. I've never dated a girl so I'm not basing these assertions on any BGR experience. You may compare them to the list of 13 characteristics (the first six and the final seven) of manhood that Albert Mohler wrote up, which he relates heavily to married life.

They're not grouped according to importance. Some of them are abstract (e.g., 35) but most of them are practical (e.g., 2). But they're not grouped this way either. I aimed to group them topically.

Please give me feedback. (Sorry the list is so long. I intended to post them over the span of three entries, but I've spent hours trying to do that, so I just gave up and did it this way. I hope that you still read it.)

The Lord's men are those who:

1. are steadfast in honesty and reliable in their follow through;

2. always wear the same face knowing that God is omnipresent;

When I say this I am speaking against people who get serious, humble and servant-like when they are in leadership but who are rowdy, immature and self-interested when not in that leadership role. People should follow their male leaders because of who they are, not the example that they display from "9 to 5."

3. learn from their mistakes;

4. admit their weaknesses and get help when they need it;

5. take good help when it is needed and offered;

I often struggle with a saviour-complex. Men need to be humble enough to give others who are blessed with talents—especially talents that these men do not have—the opportunity to serve where they have been blessed without fearing the possibility that the spotlight of leadership may dim as the leader takes less responsibility; men should take on leadership "not to please man, but to please God" (1 Thessalonians 2:4).

6. give others the chance to excel;

7. do not fear those smarter, more talented, more experienced, or more knowledgeable than them;

8. step up to encourage those around them;

9. make time for the people they're leading;

I'm writing this having returned from South East Africa project (hereafter referred to as SEA) interning (i.e., a leadership role). On top of that, for the Adventure Cycle (a one week component of SEA where teams went to different regions in Tanzania and show the evangelistic movie The Jesus Film) I led a team. From that I noticed that it's important to take care of the people who are being led by us which is very difficult if you are disconnected from them. On top of that, this important character trait of the Lord's men implies that men who are in leadership need to take time to connect with the people who are difficult to get to know whom they are leading. This needs to be done in order to serve the whole team. Ignoring the tough-to-get-to-know person has the highest probability of making him feel neglected (having been this type before in the past, I state with confidence neglected people always know that they are being neglected) which leads to bitterness. One bitter person can bring the whole team down. Illustration: One moldy slice of bread put in any loaf of bread quickly ruins the whole good loaf.

10. share their strength with others;

When someone is feeling dismayed by circumstances but the man is not discouraged at all, muster up a strategy to explain why there is hope, why it is better to not worrying about it, or even distract the discouraged person from his circumstances by talking about something that will bring the person's mind somewhere else.

11. are able to look long and hard for ways to relate to the most difficult men;

12. do not give up, but who are able to persevere, especially around the people they lead;

13. steadfastly never complain without taking action;

It's useless to complain and do nothing, in fact, it is destructive. Others might see the merits of the complaints and become discouraged. My personal opinion is to never complain in public, especially to people you are leading. People love watching leaders improve situations. So if a man complains about the situation, he had better be ready to set an example of working towards solutions instead of being those Israelites wandering the desert grumbling.

14. are courageous;

15. are patient;

16. are generous and sacrificial;

17. are fair;

18. are compassionate;

19. genuinely love their parents;

20. recognize that they need to lead women;

21. honour women in their personal thoughts;

This is referring to sexual purity with respect to the man's personal thoughts. Every woman was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26) and men's sisters in Christ are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19). Treat them as such.

22. never flirt with women;

This might raise controversy. I think that flirting is immature and completely inappropriate for men (women too, but I'll leave that issue for those more qualified to deal with). If a man is interested in a woman then he should initiate something with her—not keep her guessing. And if he's not interested in her then he shouldn't treat her in a special way. If you wouldn't do it to a guy, don't do it to a girl. An example of this deals with men's playing around with women's clothes. At the beach it might be tempting to steal a girl's shoes and tease her with it. A man wouldn't do this with a guy because the reaction isn't appealing; it only feels good coming from a girl. On top of that, it is easier to do it to a girl because by and large men are physically bigger and stronger than women, which makes it easier to do. Each of these reasons for acting in this way is unacceptable.

23. treasure deep friendships with brothers in Christ;

The Church is being weakened because men have not made enough deep connections with brothers who can sharpen them (Proverbs 27:17) but often sacrifice it for deep connections with women, which makes personal growth in manhood ambiguous (read: If a guy hangs out with girls all the time, they'll sharpen them in the ways of the Lord, but not into biblical manhood since they cannot experience that together as they are women, not men!). Men need men. And they should not be ashamed of these relationships.

24. greatly value the men in their lives who are their role models;

25. have hearts for the lost, broken, and abandoned;

"Jesus wept" (John 11:35). The ultimate man cried. Men should not be ashamed to have convictions that lead them to tears. It is not a weakness.

26. privately rebuke;

This important character trait has two implications: 1) That men should rebuke; and 2) that they should do it in private so as to not humiliate those who err.

27. never cut others down (especially not to make a point);

28. naturally cast vision, not only out of necessity, but out of deep conviction of heart;

29. lead others to prayer;

30. respect authority;

Men need to learn to submit themselves to rules, especially the ones that they do not understand or that they disagree with (provided these are not going against God's commands) in order to demonstrate how they want to be treated when they lead.

31. lead out in doing the tasks that none want to do;

32. oppose indecision and inaction at every challenged faced;

In most occasions decisions must be made and action must be taken. Fear of being wrong is not an excuse for doing the contrary. If others are not willing to do both, step up as one of the Lord's men, make a decision and act.

33. never demand anything based on their own merit;

Too often it's, "I need," which is fair; men have needs. But men may not (i.e., are not allowed to) demand it. Men deserve hell (Romans 6:23). It is rude and unloving to expect that a man should be given his every need because he exists. God gives and He takes away at His leisure (Job 1:21). To state this positively, in humility, ask for your daily bread.

34. know the Word of God;

35. glorify God with their lives;

36. attribute their every gift and success to their King.

0 comments Thursday, May 1, 2008

I'm packing tonight to leave Ottawa tomorrow. In the process I just threw out the matress that I've slept on for the past three years. (It had certainly reached its time, in my mind.)

I brought it to the back door of the house, leaving it there, saying to Tristan that I would make a few more trips to the dumpster in the morning. I went back upstairs to keep working, went back downstairs and noticed that the matress was no longer there. It was obvious to me that Tristan had made the run to the dumpster for me. When I saw this, I was planning on saying to him upon his return, "Look, God took the matress away for me!" As I reflected on this I realized, Huh, that's how the Bible displays God's sovereignty; He expresses His sovereignty through means.


For example, in Esther when the Jews were near their end, God didn't just vaporize their adversaries, He raised up Esther to save the Jews. When Midian was near obliterating Israel, God raised up Gideon to go, in His power, to fight off the Midianites (Jd. 6-7).

As soon as I realized that God may very well have, for His own secret purpose, called Tristan to go dump my matress for me, I lifted Him a word of thanks.

I love believing in a God who is absolutely (i.e., completely, unconditionally) sovereign because every single thing that happens is for His good purpose.

"And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose" (Rm. 8:28).