1 comments Monday, December 15, 2008

Feel free to correct my spelling (or grammar) if I have any errors in my posts. I just corrected my misspelling of "complementarian" in the previous posts that used it (I used to think that it had two 'i's in it).

1 comments

With engagements being put on my mind anew, and Jon Bloom, the Executive Director of Desiring God (Piper's ministry), producing an absolutely wonderful blog entry related to Joseph and Mary's engagement (i.e., betrothal), I have to point out an awesome illustration of grace, demonstrated by an awesome woman.

Matthew 1:18, 19 reads, "When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly." Hearing that Joseph decided to divorce her, you have to come to the conclusion that either Mary didn't defend herself when Joseph found out she was pregnant, or Joseph didn't believe her when she did defend herself.

I'm inclined to think the latter – that she would definitely explain that she'd seen Gabriel and that the pregnancy was of God (Lk. 1:26-38). She'd heard from God, and not telling it would be like Ezekiel not sharing his prophecy with the world. So I think that Joseph didn't believe her (as Jon Bloom imagines in his hypothetical narrative). Mary had somehow exceeded the trust that she'd earned from Joseph. Her story was indeed incredible.

I wonder what sort of miracles I would be too naturalistic to believe. Would I believe it if my best friend had been supernaturally given a haircut by God? Would I believe it if my pastor told me that he was about to get on a plane for Saudi Arabia when God transported him there, as He did to Philip away from the Ethiopian eunuch? Do I trust those whom I should trust unconditionally? Is unconditional trust necessary? Was Joseph wrong for not trusting Mary?

If Joseph had been right, and Mary had cheated on him, then he would have been justified in leaving her (Mt. 19:9 – the true application of this verse). And I don't want to vilify him by overstressing this, but he could have given her a second chance. If she'd cheated on him, it would have been either during their engagement, or shortly before. It would have completely changed his perception of her. But he could have gone ahead with the marriage anyway.

The point is, though, Mary was faithful! And it would have no doubt hurt her that the man she loved, and was going to take as her husband, didn't believe her on as critical an issue as fidelity. While never having been in a reciprocating BGR, I don't have full experience of the truth of the statement, "Trust is the foundation that holds a marriage up" (although, you might be more spiritual than me and say that's blasphemy of the highest order since God is the foundation that holds a marriage up), I still believe it.

Mary was such an amazing woman, that even though her groom-to-be thought that she was a fornicator, she still married him. I'm not Catholic, so I don't think that she somehow bore James, the brother of Jesus, without having sex, nor do I think that she ascended into heaven (as Enoch, Elijah and Jesus did), nor do I think that she was sinless, but I still think that she's amazing. She forgave Joseph's lack of faith in her and gave him a second chance. On top of that, she raised the Lord, but I'm trying not to overshadow small moments of massive, Holy Spirit given forgiveness.

I hope and pray that I have that much grace with my friends, and someday in my marriage.

0 comments Monday, December 8, 2008

Denny Burk (professor at Southern, and dean of Southern's undergrad college, Boyce College) put up a blog entry last Friday, riding on the coattails of Tim Challies. Dr. Burk quoted an excerpt from a Time article published in 1940. It was about the Christians who were in the way. Einstein makes an amazing statement to the credit of God preserving His Church:
Being a lover of freedom, when the revolution came in Germany, I looked to the universities to defend it, knowing that they had always boasted of their devotion to the cause of truth; but, no, the universities immediately were silenced. Then I looked to the great editors of the newspapers whose flaming editorials in days gone by had proclaimed their love of freedom; but they, like the universities, were silenced in a few short weeks. . . .

Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler's campaign for suppressing truth. I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration because the Church alone has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual truth and moral freedom. I am forced thus to confess that what I once despised I now praise unreservedly.

What a powerful witness of the greatness of the Church from a nonchristian! I pray that the Church today would stand steadfastly, in like fashion to the Church opposing Hilter, against abortion, racisim, gay marriage, poverty and genocide.
 
Father, Your Kingdom come and Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven (Mt. 6:10).

2 comments Friday, December 5, 2008

I've already posted this entry in early May, but the formatting was choppy. In posting the entry yesterday on the True Woman Conference, though, I had an idea for how I could post the list in a more appealing, more organized way. The original post follows, although, I did make a few changes.

Last year when I got back from Tanzania I wrote a list of the characteristics that I think every Christian man should exemplify. I was motivated to do this having worked with some tremendous men who displayed amazing character and vision and love for Jesus Christ. Furthermore, a girl I was working with commented that she respected the biblical man I described. I figured I would share these characteristics.

Another thing to note is that these come from the mind of a single guy. I've never dated a girl so I'm not basing these assertions on any BGR experience. You may compare them to the list of 13 characteristics (the first six and the final seven) of manhood that Albert Mohler wrote up, which he relates heavily to married life.

They're not grouped according to importance. Some of them are abstract (e.g., 35) but most of them are practical (e.g., 2). But they're not grouped this way either. I aimed to group them topically.

Sorry the list is so long. That notwithstanding, please give me feedback.

The Lord's men are those who:

1.

are steadfast in honesty and reliable in their follow through;

2.

always wear the same face knowing that God is omnipresent;

When I say this I am speaking against people who get serious, humble and servant-like when they are in leadership but who are rowdy, immature and self-interested when not in that leadership role. People should follow their male leaders because of who they are, not the example that they display from "9 to 5."

3.

learn from their mistakes;

4.

admit their weaknesses and get help when they need it;

5.

take good help when it is needed and offered;

I often struggle with a saviour-complex. Men need to be humble enough to give others who are blessed with talents—especially talents that these men do not have—the opportunity to serve where they have been blessed without fearing the possibility that the spotlight of leadership may dim as the leader takes less responsibility; men should take on leadership "not to please man, but to please God" (1 Thessalonians 2:4).

6.

give others the chance to excel;

7.

do not fear those smarter, more talented, more experienced, or more knowledgeable than them;

8.

step up to encourage those around them;

9.

make time for the people they're leading;

I'm writing this having returned from South East Africa project (hereafter referred to as SEA) interning (i.e., a leadership role). On top of that, for the Adventure Cycle (a one week component of SEA where teams went to different regions in Tanzania and show the evangelistic movie The Jesus Film) I led a team. From that I noticed that it's important to take care of the people who are being led by us which is very difficult if you are disconnected from them. On top of that, this important character trait of the Lord's men implies that men who are in leadership need to take time to connect with the people who are difficult to get to know whom they are leading. This needs to be done in order to serve the whole team. Ignoring the tough-to-get-to-know person has the highest probability of making him feel neglected (having been this type before in the past, I state with confidence neglected people always know that they are being neglected) which leads to bitterness. One bitter person can bring the whole team down. Illustration: One mouldy slice of bread put in with any loaf of bread quickly ruins the whole good loaf.

10.

share their strength with others;

When someone is feeling dismayed by circumstances but the man is not discouraged at all, muster up a strategy to explain why there is hope, why it is better to not worrying about it, or even distract the discouraged person from his circumstances by talking about something that will bring the person's mind somewhere else.

11.

are able to look long and hard for ways to relate to the most difficult men;

12.

do not give up, but who are able to persevere, especially around the people they lead;

13.

steadfastly never complain without taking action;

It's useless to complain and do nothing, in fact, it is destructive. Others might see the merits of the complaints and become discouraged. My personal opinion is to never complain in public, especially to people you are leading. People love watching leaders improve situations. So if a man complains about the situation, he had better be ready to set an example of working towards solutions instead of being those Israelites wandering the desert grumbling.

14.

are courageous;

15.

are patient;

16.

are generous and sacrificial;

17.

are fair;

18.

are compassionate;

19.

genuinely love their parents;

20.

recognize that they need to lead women;

21.

honour women in their personal thoughts;

This is referring to sexual purity with respect to the man's personal thoughts. Every woman was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26) and men's sisters in Christ are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19). Treat them as such.

22.

never flirt with women;

This might raise controversy. I think that flirting is immature and completely inappropriate for men (women too, but I'll leave that issue for those more qualified to deal with). If a man is interested in a woman then he should initiate something with her—not keep her guessing. And if he's not interested in her then he shouldn't treat her in a special way. If you wouldn't do it to a guy, don't do it to a girl. An example of this deals with men's playing around with women's clothes. At the beach it might be tempting to steal a girl's shoes and tease her with it. A man wouldn't do this with a guy because the reaction isn't appealing; it only feels good coming from a girl. On top of that, it is easier to do it to a girl because by and large men are physically bigger and stronger than women, which makes it easier to do. Each of these reasons for acting in this way is unacceptable.

**Update: I no longer agree with the characteristic stated here. The note more accurately represents me, but I have still moved on to different convictions since writing these 36 characteristics nearly a year and a half ago. I'm not deleting this point because I don't want to change the spirit of this post from the original one in May. You can see the comment I made in this post for a little more data, if you're interested.**

23.

treasure deep friendships with brothers in Christ;

The Church is being weakened because men have not made enough deep connections with brothers who can sharpen them (Proverbs 27:17) but often sacrifice it for deep connections with women, which makes personal growth in manhood ambiguous (i.e., if a guy hangs out with girls all the time, they'll sharpen them in the ways of the Lord, but not into biblical manhood since they cannot experience that together as they are women, not men!). Men need men. And they should not be ashamed of these relationships.

24.

greatly value the men in their lives who are their role models;

25.

have hearts for the lost, broken, and abandoned;

"Jesus wept" (John 11:35). The ultimate man cried. Men should not be ashamed to have convictions that lead them to tears. It is not a weakness.

26.

privately rebuke;

This important character trait has two implications: 1) That men should rebuke; and 2) that they should do it in private so as to not humiliate those who err.

27.

never cut others down (especially not to make a point);

28.

naturally cast vision, not only out of necessity, but out of deep conviction of heart;

29.

lead others to prayer;

30.

respect authority;

Men need to learn to submit themselves to rules, especially the ones that they do not understand or that they disagree with (provided these are not going against God's commands) in order to demonstrate how they want to be treated when they lead.

31.

lead out in doing the tasks that none want to do;

32.

oppose indecision and inaction at every challenged faced;

In most occasions decisions must be made and action must be taken. Fear of being wrong is not an excuse for doing the contrary. If others are not willing to do both, step up as one of the Lord's men, make a decision and act.

33.

never demand anything based on their own merit;

Too often it's, "I need," which is fair; men have needs. But men may not (i.e., are not allowed to) demand it. Men deserve hell (Romans 6:23). It is rude and unloving to expect that a man should be given his every need because he exists. God gives and He takes away at His leisure (Job 1:21). To state this positively, in humility, ask for your daily bread.

34.

know the Word of God;

35.

glorify God with their lives;

36.

attribute their every gift and success to their King.

Update: I've added a clarification on number 22.

0 comments Thursday, December 4, 2008

"It's not about going back to the nineteenth century; it's about going back to the Scriptures." Albert Mohler said something like that on his radio program on November 25th, in reference to complementarian Christian women asserting that they want to start a counter-cultural movement where it is acknowledged that there is a difference in the roles that men and women are to enter into. He said that when he read the True Woman Manifesto (I'll get to it in this post), he got the impression that if a Christian woman in the 19th century were reading it, she would wonder why the document was written. It would be like a duh moment. The goal of the complementarian movement is not to make people old fashioned. The goal is to be biblical.

On the program, he was talking with Mary Kassian, professor at Southern Seminary, Canadian, author and speaker (and the first person to get a post with the "Character" label on my blog). On it, they were talking about the True Woman conference that happened back in mid-October, where about 6300 women went to listen and interact about biblical lessons on gender, and more specifically, femininity. They talked a fair chunk about the document I mentioned above. Mrs. Kassian wants to see 100 000 women sign the document internationally. That's my hope for many of the girls who read this blog, that maybe you would sign it.

I mostly wrote this post because I liked what Mohler said so much. Evangelical feminism is brand new, less than a hundred years old. It's coming out of the culture of radical feminism, not the Bible. If egalitarianism were biblical it would have emerged in Church history at some point earlier. It didn't. Biblical gender is not about going back to the cave man days, but it's about being biblical.

Below is the audio that's from the conference. I hope you listen to it. I've only listened to the panel discussion and Mrs. Kassian's first talk so far, but I'm going to read the rest soon. I highly recommend her talk.

Thursday, October 9

The Ultimate Meaning of True Womanhood
Pastor John Piper

watch

listen

read

From Him, Through Him, To Him
Nancy Leigh DeMoss

watch

listen

read


Friday, October 10

You've Come a Long Way, Baby!
Mary Kassian

watch

listen

read

A Resolve to Believe
Karen Loritts

watch

listen

read

A Woman After God's Own Heart
Janet Parshall

watch

listen

read

God's Jewels
Joni Tada

watch

listen

read


Saturday, October 11

Panel Discussion
Mary Kassian, Holly Elliff, Karen Loritts, Barbara Rainey, Carolyn McCulley

watch

listen

read

For Such A Time As This
Nancy Leigh DeMoss

watch

listen

read